‘Back-Door Meetings’: Lawsuit Alleges Elections Agency Secretly Met With Voting Machine Vendors To Weaken Security Standards

(Photo by Sean Rayford/Getty Images)
  • A lawsuit filed by a non-profit advocacy group and a federally appointed election advisor alleged secret meetings between the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and voting systems manufacturers to revise election standards.
  • “These back-door meetings resulted in secretly developed revisions to the standards that benefit manufacturers by weakening voting system security to reduce costs,” the group said in a statement.
  • The EAC’s revisions lowered election security requirements and made it easier for voting machines to be connected to the internet, the complaint alleged.
  • The agency did not properly notify election advisors of its changes to the standards, according to the complaint.

A lawsuit filed by a federally appointed election advisor Tuesday alleged the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) secretly met with voting machine vendors to revise election security standards.

The complaint, filed Tuesday in the D.C. District Court by Free Speech For People and EAC advisor Philip Stark, alleged the EAC held meetings from July to August 2020 with voting systems manufacturers, behind closed doors, to discuss revising election security standards. The agency then published these revisions on Feb. 1, 2021, which Free Speech For People argued benefited manufacturers by reducing compliance costs, “without the proper notice and comment procedure required by law.”

The standards published in February, known as the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), did not contain language that would have banned devices capable of connecting voting systems wirelessly to the internet, but did mandate these devices be disabled.

This was insufficient, the complaint argued, “because reliably, consistently, and effectively disabling the devices is complex and difficult.”

The EAC said the guidelines would still ban machines from connecting to the internet, according to the Associated Press.

“These back-door meetings resulted in secretly developed revisions to the standards that benefit manufacturers by weakening voting system security to reduce costs,” the group said in a statement.

The complaint also alleged the EAC had not allowed Free Speech For People to participate in the discussions, and refused to provide the group with the communications that took place during the meetings.

Free Speech For People is a non-profit organization that advocates for election security and fairness and is opposed to political corruption and “big money” in politics, according to its website.


“The laws very clearly require the federal voting system guidelines be developed in a completely transparent and public process,” Susan Greenhalgh, senior advisor for election security for Free Speech For People, said in the statement. “Instead, the EAC brazenly flouted its legal obligation to adhere to a transparent process, choosing instead to invite the manufacturers into private meetings so they could alter the voting system standards to ease requirements and benefit the manufacturers, all at the expense of the most basic cyber security best practices.”

The EAC is responsible for developing national election security standards, certifying voting machines, and establishing guidance for voting systems to be in compliance with the Help America Vote Act of 2002, according to the agency’s website. Though voluntary, the guidelines it develops are used by voting systems across the country, according to its website.

Other revisions to VVSG that Free Speech For People alleged benefited vendors included removing standards for physical locks on voting machines, removal of the requirement that voting systems provide data reports at the end of elections, and weakening transparency standards. (RELATED: Texas Democrats Seeking To Prevent Passage Of Election Security Bill Flee To DC)

“The ‘bottom line’ in election technology should be the trustworthiness of voting systems, not the profits of vendors,” plaintiff and member of the EAC board of advisors Philip Stark said in the statement. “Making substantive changes to VVSG2.0 without consulting the Board of Advisors is both unlawful and reckless.”

The Election Assistance Commission did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect more information about Free Speech For People.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.